Engage Law Review

Introduction

For decades, sports laws have shaped the playing field—literally and figuratively—for athletes. Yet, a deep divide remains between men’s and women’s sports, shaped by long-standing cultural and historical biases. In the past, female athletes were often sidelined, denied the resources, recognition, and opportunities afforded to their male counterparts; that all changed with the groundbreaking passage of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972, a law that forced schools and colleges receiving federal funding to level the playing field. Suddenly, access to sports was no longer a privilege—it was a right. But while Title IX sparked a revolution in women’s athletics, the battle isn’t over. From funding gaps to professional roadblocks, female athletes still fight for equity in a system that too often falls short.

II. Historical Context and Development of Sports Laws

Early Legal Frameworks

For much of history, men’s sports thrived under robust legal and institutional backing, while women’s athletics struggled to gain a foothold. Throughout most of the 20th century, female athletes were sidelined, with little legal support to ensure equal funding or opportunities. This lack of infrastructure not only hindered their progress but also fueled persistent stereotypes and discrimination against women in sports.

Title IX: A Legal Turning Point

The passing of Title IX in 1972 was a game-changer for gender equity in sports. What started as an educational reform quickly transformed the landscape for female athletes, mandating equal access and funding for women’s sports. Schools were now required to: offer athletic opportunities in proportion to gender enrollment, ensure continuous growth of programs for underrepresented genders, and truly reflect the interests and abilities of female students. Title IX became the cornerstone of women’s progress in athletics, reshaping the playing field in ways that were once unimaginable.

One of the most pronounced cases, Cohen v. Brown University (1996), occurred when Brown University eliminated funding for women's sports teams. The court deemed this a clear violation of Title IX, reaffirming the legal imperative for gender equity in sports. This ruling underscored the critical need for institutions to be held accountable in the face of the pervasive misogyny that still runs rampant in male-dominated arenas.

Professional Sports Development

Professional male leagues, like the NBA and MLB, received early legal and financial support to ensure a solid base for future success. Women's leagues, like the WNBA, which was founded in 1996, were more difficult to establish, often with minimal funding and struggling through court cases to attain corporate sponsorships. These differences represent deep-seated inequities in resource and funding allocation.

III. Funding and Resource Allocation

Educational Institutions

While Title IX has greatly improved female participation in sports, inequities still exist. Schools often have heavier investments in men's teams when it comes to facilities, coaching and travel. A 2021 NCAA Gender Equity Review reported striking contrasts, including how men's basketball tournament budgets dwarf women's tournament budgets. While Title IX requires equality, the application is spotty, and many female athletes receive short shrift.

Professional Sports

Men’s leagues dominate the revenue landscape in professional sports, and this financial power directly influences the ongoing pay and resource disparities. Despite the Equal Pay Act of 1963, which mandates equal pay for equal work, women athletes often find themselves earning far less than their male counterparts. A prime example is the U.S. Women's National Team's lawsuit against the U.S. Soccer Federation. The 2022 settlement, which secured a historic $24 million payout and equal pay for both male and female players, marked a significant victory. Yet, it also highlighted the deep-rooted systemic barriers that women continue to face in their fight for pay equity.

Media Representation and Sponsorship

While legal frameworks don’t govern media coverage, the unequal representation of women’s sports still has a profound impact on funding. Sponsorship deals and television airtime remain heavily skewed in favor of men’s sports, perpetuating a significant resource gap. Advocates argue that the key to leveling the playing field is incentivizing companies through tax benefits and enacting policies that ensure equal media coverage for women’s sports.

IV. Pay Equity and Collective Bargaining

While men’s leagues often generate far more revenue, the pay gap remains glaringly disproportionate. Take the NBA, where players rake in millions, compared to the capped salaries in the WNBA, which are a fraction of that. This stark disparity has sparked collective bargaining efforts, like the 2020 WNBA Collective Bargaining Agreement, which secured higher salaries and better benefits for players. Still, the gap is staggering, a clear reflection of the systemic undervaluation of women’s sports.

Men’s leagues, such as the NFL, benefit from powerful labor unions like the NFL Players Association, backed by much larger revenue streams. In contrast, women’s leagues struggle to negotiate fair contracts, underscoring the urgent need for stronger labor protections and revenue-sharing models that prioritize women athletes.

V. Discrimination and Harassment

Title IX prohibits gender discrimination in sports, while the Civil Rights Act of 1964 extends broader anti-discrimination protections. However, enforcement gaps and limited application in sports hinder progress. High-profile cases like the Larry Nassar scandal exposed systemic failures to protect female athletes from abuse, prompting reforms such as the Protecting Young Victims from Sexual Abuse and Safe Sport Authorization Act of 2017. Despite these measures, implementation challenges persist.

VI. Global Perspective

International Policies

Global sports organizations, such as FIFA and the International Olympic Committee (IOC), play a significant role in shaping gender equity in athletics. While the IOC has introduced guidelines promoting equality, their enforcement varies across countries and events. For instance, disparities in prize money, such as those in the FIFA Women’s World Cup, highlight the need for uniform standards. The USWNT’s fight for equal pay exemplifies international inequities. While the women outperformed the men, they earned substantially less. The 2022 settlement secured equal pay for the men's and women's teams and set a global reform precedent, but it also underscored the need for broader systemic change.

Government initiatives have also played a crucial role in addressing gender disparities in sports. In 2020, the U.S. Congress introduced the "Even Playing Field Act," which aimed to promote equal investment in women's sports programs. Similarly, the European Union’s "Gender Equality in Sport" initiative has pushed for increased funding and leadership opportunities for female athletes. However, the effectiveness of these measures remains inconsistent, emphasizing the need for stronger accountability mechanisms across different nations.

VII. Recommendations for Legal Reform

What is needed is the consistent reinforcement of equity-focused laws in practice. This can be achieved through the establishment of independent monitoring bodies tasked with ensuring compliance with Title IX regulations. These bodies would hold each institution responsible for providing equitable opportunities and resources. Additionally, penalties should be imposed on institutions that deliberately misallocate finances, reinforcing equity and inclusion.

Beyond strengthening Title IX, legislative action must address pay disparity, especially in professional sports. Expanding the Equal Pay Act to explicitly cover these disparities and mandating transparent reporting of revenues and salary allocations would be instrumental in closing the gap and providing financial equity for female athletes. A 2021 Government Accountability Office (GAO) report found that female athletes in professional leagues received significantly lower compensation despite comparable or greater revenue generation in some cases. Strengthening federal oversight of financial disclosures would provide further transparency.

Moreover, media representation and sponsorship are pivotal to achieving gender equity in sports. Providing tax benefits to companies that sponsor women's sports could incentivize greater investment, while policies mandating equal media coverage would ensure that female athletes and events receive the recognition necessary to cultivate public interest and support. In 2022, a study by the U.S. Department of Education revealed that women’s sports receive less than 4% of total sports media coverage, reinforcing the need for regulatory intervention.

On a larger scale, international cooperation is essential for enacting meaningful changes in gender equity in sports. Establishing international treaties that support these values and developing a global fund dedicated to women’s sports would supply the necessary means and mechanisms for worldwide change. For example, the United Nations’ "Sports for Development and Peace" initiative has advocated for gender equity policies, but enforcement mechanisms remain weak. Strengthening these agreements through binding commitments would ensure more consistent global progress.

VIII. Conclusion

While the legal framework for sports has significantly advanced gender equity, numerous challenges persist. Women's sports continue to face disparities in funding, pay, and representation, which are deeply rooted in systemic biases. Laws such as Title IX and the Equal Pay Act have driven progress, but stronger enforcement is essential to achieving true parity. On a global scale, harmonizing sports laws and promoting equitable practices are critical steps toward fostering inclusivity. Government initiatives, legal oversight, and international cooperation will be necessary to drive further progress. A fairer future for all athletes is within reach through continued legal reform and social advocacy.

FOOTNOTES

COMING SOON